Tag Archives: mccain

In the Holiness of Truth…Barack Obama: “Whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is, you know, above my pay grade.”

We just found out that William Ayers, that guy who was according to Obama just a guy in the neighborhood, had plans for murdering upwards of 25 million folks who might fail to be re-educated in the camps after the revolution. Yea I know it is freaking unbelievable that scum like that not only ISN’T in prison, he is not ONLY a Professor at a University (showing how corrupt our Universities are) but he is the mentor of a Presidential Candidate. Btw if you DON’T believe me then merely scroll down to the bottom of the page and take a gander at the video of the FBI Informant who infiltrated the Weathermen talking about it. He cannot believe what he heard either. Thanks to Confederate Yankee for this blockbuster.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people….

Bear with me I have a point. This post is about this picture.

 fig19

This is child is 20 weeks old. Obama believes it is above his pay grade to decide whether this is a child or not. His "friends" at one point discussed killing 25 million grown individuals who refuse to be re-educated. Hmm…life is cheap around his friends.

You don’t need a weather man
To know which way the wind blows

Please explain how he has gotten this far in the election process. Here is that FBI Informant talking about being inside of the Weather Underground. Now remember that Ayers and Dorhn were among the founding members of this group so they surely were involved in the planning of your murder. Nice.

 

Remember that Obama says:

SEN. OBAMA: George, but this is an example of what I’m talking about.

This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.

A person who planned the murders of 25 million folks is just a professor who lives in his neighborhood. Even if we take Obama at his word, and that is hazardous indeed since the man is a habitual liar, exactly what does it tell you about a man wanting to be the President of the United States who needs a Weatherman to know which way the wind blows? Exactly how big does the CLUE BAT have to be to wake Obama up to the despicable nature of his friends?

And that is just ONE of his suspicious friends. Obama has plenty of suspect acquaintances…is his judgement as bad as it was regarding Ayers? If so, is this the person you want dealing with the world?

 In the Holiness of Truth

Welcome to the New Thugocracy…Courtesy of Barack Obama! Shut Up Christians…or we will sue you!

Americans United for Separation of Church and State has extensive links to the Democratic Party. So it follows that they would be the group that would stand up to guard Obama’s flanks while he lies his ass off. Obama has been denying his extreme abortion views in an attempt to capture the white Catholic vote. A Bishop stood up to denounce his lies and naturally Obama gets his surrogates to fight his battles to silence his critics.

WASHINGTON — A church-state watchdog group has asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate whether the Roman Catholic bishop of Paterson, N.J., violated tax laws by denouncing Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama.

In a letter sent to the IRS on Wednesday (Oct. 22), Americans United for Separation of Church and State accused Paterson Bishop Arthur Serratelli of illegal partisanship for lambasting Obama’s support of abortion rights. Group asks IRS to investigate Catholic bishop against Obama – USATODAY.com

Here is what that Bishop said…

Serratelli wrote that Obama has pledged, if elected president, to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, abortion-rights legislation the Catholic Church vehemently opposes.

"If this politician fulfills his promise, not only will many of our freedoms as Americans be taken from us, but the innocent and vulnerable will spill their blood," Serratelli wrote.

Here is Barack affirming his intention to sign the Freedom of Choice act.

When anti-choice protesters blocked the opening of an Illinois Planned Parenthood clinic in a community where affordable health care is in short supply, I was the only candidate for President who spoke out against it. And I will continue to defend this right by passing the Freedom of Choice Act as president.

Here is that Far Right Rag Time Magazine on Obama’s attempt to moderate his extreme stance on abortion…he is a LIAR! Here is Obama talking to Rick Warren.

Meanwhile, Obama offered an artful dodge to the question of when a human deserves rights. "Whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade," he said. Like many of his responses that night, it was a long, careful, nuanced plowing of middle ground. He did not suggest that the only rights that matter are a woman’s over her body. He also affirmed his moral dimensions of the issue: he noted his willingness to limit late-term abortions, provided there is an exception if a woman’s health is at risk; and he talked about finding the resources to help women who choose to keep their baby, and about trying to reduce the need for abortions in the first place.

Obama is a terrifying prospect as a President. My faith in the American people has me believing that they are seeing through this crap but heaven help us if he manages to fool them.

When you start scaring folks like Michael Barone…well that says a lot since I have never heard him be this alarmist about a Presidential Candidate.

Michael Barone Sounds The Alarm About the Coming Thugocracy of Obama…"First They Came for the Communists" MSM and Some Conservative Elite Tone Deaf to Their Mortal Danger.

A Very Interesting Look at the Election…The Left’s Big Blunder

This is very interesting and while it is a long article it is very much worth your time.

The Left’s Big Blunder

The disastrously counter-productive strategy of Obama’s supporters

October 15, 2008

Two campaigns are being waged right now for the presidency of the United States. No, I’m not talking about the Obama campaign and the McCain campaign. I’m talking about the real-world campaign and the meta-campaign.
The real-world campaign involves speeches and proposals and facts and scandals and political positions and news events. These details, however, are becoming increasingly irrelevant, and have become subsumed by the meta-campaign, which consists of perceptions, polls, reactions, analyses and summations. Until very recently, elections were decided by real-world facts — but not anymore. Facts and events in and of themselves are no longer important; what’s important is how everyone reacts to them. And how do we find out the public’s mood concerning this or that incident? Why, the media tells us, that’s how.
Or so we’ve been led to believe.

We’re all part of the campaign now. Every single one of us. Our opinions, our actions, are bundled together as a group and used as weapons in the race for the White House. When the media reports on what people think, either through public-opinion polling or reportage about anecdotal incidents, it becomes an endless feedback loop, in which the media’s representation of most people’s purported thoughts is supposed to influence everyone else’s thoughts. And then they take another poll to determine how effective the first poll was in influencing public opinion, and the cycle starts all over again. Since everyone now knows that any public expression of their political opinions might be reported by the media, even the most innocent activity becomes a calculated campaign action. Saying how you intend to vote is not simply an expression of how you intend to vote, but rather a component of the public barometer of how the majority intends to vote, which is then used by the media and the blogs to influence everyone else. Nothing is done in all innocence anymore.
It’s no longer a matter of dispute that the mainstream media, overall, very strongly leans to the left. Over 90% of journalists classify themselves politically as "liberal" to varying degrees, and innumerable instances of left-wing bias on the part of the media have been pointed out by bloggers over the years. Yes, a small subset of media outlets are identifiably conservative, but they are vastly outnumbered, both in sheer numbers and in influence, by the liberal media. This fact takes on intense importance in an era when the "news" becomes (as it has become) a subjective matter. Nearly any fact or incident can be "spun" to Obama’s benefit.
Obama’s supporters and his official campaign have taken great advantage of this felicitous informational landscape — first, that the meta-campaign trumps reality, and second, that the media is cooperative and complicit. For example, after presidential debates, the leading left-wing blogs always coordinate massive online opinion-poll-stuffing campaigns. After the Palin-Biden vice-presidential debate, the overwhelming consensus on conservative and centrist blogs was that Palin had won handily, and that Biden spoke mostly in a soporific monotone while spewing a continuous stream of easily debunked falsehoods. And yet readers of DailyKos, the Huffington Post, Democratic Underground and dozens of other top left-wing blogs swarmed en masse to vote (often repeatedly) in mainstream online polls about the debate, so that afterward, CNN (among many others) could run headlines that said "57% Think Biden Won Debate," basing their conclusion on the results of the online polls. And once enough of these articles get published, then they themselves become "proof" of the debate’s supposed outcome, and before long (often just a matter of hours) it becomes a "fact" no longer up for discussion that Biden won the debate. This fact is then referenced by pundits, and slips into supposedly neutral news stories.
The illusory quest for conformist decision-making in the 2008 presidential election
Say, for example, that you were an Obama supporter who watched the Vice Presidential debate and felt that Palin had done well and was a more effective debater than Biden — though not well enough to change your mind about voting for the Obama-Biden ticket. Immediately afterward you encounter an online poll, asking you to vote on who won the debate. What do you do? I suspect that most, if not nearly all, Obama supporters would lie and still vote in the poll that Biden had won the debate, even though they felt that Palin had in fact defeated him. But why do so? As an Obama supporter, you still want your candidate to win, so that every action you take should revolve around only one question: Will this help Obama win? Probably unconsciously, people assume without really thinking about why, that if enough people say Biden won the debate, then a general consensus will be reached that Biden did win the debate, and as a result some vague category of Americans who up until that point had not been Obama supporters will change their allegiances and in reality vote for Obama-Biden on election day.
The Obama campaign itself also takes advantage of the sympathetic media to construct a facade of inevitability. The campaign will stage-manage crowds and dictate camera angles so that Obama is seen to not only have overwhelming numbers of fans but the correct demographic proportion of fans; the campaign will coordinate Obama appearances to coincide with rock concerts or other festivals so they can point to the huge crowds who showed up to watch Obama; and the media plays right along.

McCain supporters often complain about this strategy by the Left, going to great pains to point out the poll stuffing, the deceptive photos, the crowd overestimation, the slanted media coverage, and so forth. But should conservatives be so concerned? I propose that McCain supporters should be GLAD this is happening — because the Left is in fact making a disastrous strategic blunder.
A substantial portion of the Left’s strategy during this campaign is to create the perception that as many people as possible are supporting Obama. They strive to not simply show that he has a lot of supporters (which, obviously, he has), but to purposely inflate or exaggerate the numbers in order to make his support seem larger than it really is. The drive to do this seems almost automatic; it is assumed by Obama’s supporters to be the most effective campaign strategy. It’s so automatic that they perhaps are no longer even aware that it is a strategy. But why? What purpose is possibly served by this behavior? Has anyone on the Left ever paused, stepped back, and asked, "Wait a minute — why are we doing this? Are we sure it’s the correct course of action?" Doing everything possible to inflate the perceived support of Democratic candidates has become so de rigueur that the Left has long ago forgotten why they’re even doing it.
This essay examines the underlying faulty assumptions of this strategy — and shows why it’s not only counter-productive, but could backfire disastrously. The Left’s Big Blunder

IF ELECTED, OBAMA WILL BE MY PRESIDENT…Yea I am sure the Left appreciates Rick Moran’s Generosity. We beclown ourselves…the Left allows us to.

Rick Moran put up this lovely little post that shows how reasonable he is…boy the left is impressed. The left will save a wonderful seat on the train to oblivion for dear old nice guy Rick.

Civics 101 people; the guy who gets the most votes, wins.

You can talk about “voter fraud” and “stealing elections” all you want but the fact remains that if Obama is certified by the electoral college and the House of Representatives as President of the United States, that ends the discussion in our republic. There is no more important aspect of democracy than the minority accepting the will of the majority. The constitution gives the minority certain protections against getting steamrolled by the majority. But it doesn’t give the minority the right to torpedo the legitimacy of the winner.

Yea a guy who has lied about every sort of sordid relationship he has ever had in the past. A guy who drove one blogger to wonder if Obama had even one reasonable relationship that he could point to with pride…not of course Wright, Phleger, Kalid, Rezko, Ayers, Dorhn, and Frank Davis. A guy who started out as a Socialist and never looked back…a guy who has moved Michael Barone to declare the coming of the Thugocracy. A guy whose idea of free speech is he can say anything he wants and his opponents can shut the hell up and sit down. A guy who called on his followers to get in their faces…yea this guy is YOUR President if he wins.

He is my enemy and will remain so until I successfully get him impeached or he loses in 2012.

Obama has played to win…we have played fair. The Left plays for keeps… we play to feel good about ourselves in the morning. The Left plays to bury us…we play to allow them a chance NEXT time. We never understood that using the tactics of the left did not mean we adopted the philosophy of the left…it meant we thought winning was important. Now we may be about to find out how important it was.

We beclown ourselves…the Left allows us to.

Right Wing Nut House » IF ELECTED, OBAMA WILL BE MY PRESIDENT

McCain blasts Obama, Democrats for Fannie Mae meltdown…Bring the Heat John!

Bout time for us to take the fight to these Democratic assclowns who run around seeing who can tell the biggest lies about how all this financial mess started. .

Hot Air » Blog Archive » McCain blasts Obama, Democrats for Fannie Mae meltdown

When you start receiving flak, you know you’re over the target.

More at RedState BREAKING: The Gloves are well and truly off on Fannie Mae.

Jim Geraghty. is singing the same tune bring the heat John bring the heat!

Obama Begins Counterattack By Shooting Himself in the Foot…err oops Obama Loses Cool Attacks Former POW for Not Being Able to Reach Keyboard Due to Injuries Suffered When Tortured…hmm Sounds Like a Bad Idea.

Hey besides all the valid reasons to forget Obama, like his associations with unrepentant terrorists and black liberation crazy preachers, the plain fact that he cannot keep his cool speaks to his not being ready for anything more than being elected to dog catcher.

The attack was direct, accusing McCain of being out of touch after 26 years in Washington. Using jaunty, humorous music, a picture of a younger McCain with shaggy hair and the hint of sideburns, and images of massive, antiquated cellphones and a Rubik’s Cube, the ad is the clearest evocation yet of McCain’s age. The Republican turned 72 late last month.

That strategy should work wonders with Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio since there are NO old folks there.

“He admits he still doesn’t know how to use a computer, can’t send e-mail. Still doesn’t understand the economy, and favors $200 billion in new tax cuts for corporations, but almost nothing for the middle class. . . . After one president who was out of touch,” it concludes, “we just can’t afford more of the same.” The Obama campaign said the ad would be aired nationally on cable and on other outlets in swing states. Obama Campaign Begins Counterattack – washingtonpost.com

Kinda tough to send email if your arms and fingers were broken so badly that you cannot reach the keyboard. From the Boston Globe…

The outrage comes from inside: McCain’s severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. Friends marvel at McCain’s encyclopedic knowledge of sports. He’s an avid fan – Ted Williams is his hero – but he can’t raise his arm above his shoulder to throw a baseball.

And if you are going to attack someone for being too old and broken to know how to use the Internet it might help to at least be goddamn RIGHT about his NOT using the Internet. From a Forbes article in 2000, when Obama was busy admitting in his loss to a former Black Panther that there wasn’t much difference between them, in this article we find out that McCain was using the Internet in innovative ways.

McCain himself was convinced early on that the Internet had to play a critical role in the campaign. Time and again it allowed him to leverage his money and his organization. “In the Virginia primary,” McCain told me, “we needed a lot of petitions signed to get on the ballot. We had the form available to download off the Internet and got 17,000 signatures with very little trouble.”

farther down:

The campaign’s innovative use of the Internet could turn out to be the most important single factor of this year’s election. And woe unto the future candidate who doesn’t study the McCain 2000 Internet campaign strategy carefully. “The Web was only an electronic billboard in the last two elections,” Max Fose says, “but this is the first time anyone ran a truly interactive campaign.” It certainly will not be the last.

If Obama is this incompetent running a campaign then exactly how is it that his combination of far left beliefs and sheer incompetence will be anything but a huge disaster for the country? Hat tip HOTAIR. 

Hot Air Channeling Bullshit From Mickey Kaus, the Same Guy Who Believes a Closet Marxist (Obama) Is Better for America Than a American Hero McCain…Okey Dokey.

Listen up folks no one who reads my blog can accuse me of being for Amnesty. But there are things that are more important than Illegal Immigration…like maybe the fact that a bunch of Islamic Lunatics want to set off a Nuke inside of Mickey Kaus’s pants. Hot Air Headlines » Ann Coulter thinks it’s “insane” to send more troops to Afghanistan? So when both Mickey Kaus who seems to be voting for Obama and Mark Krikorian start putting words into Ann Coulters mouth to attack McCain we know we have reached absurdity times 2.

The problem is to start neither of them and for that matter Hot Air are clever enough to understand that it is NOT Ann Coulter they are quoting it is the Blogger who runs the GetDrunkAndVote4McCain Blog. That aside both Mark Krikorian and Kaus are seriously delusional if they believe that Obama will prosecute the war on terror with the same fervor as McCain. Obama is a closet Marxist and no sorry that is not a good thing even if it was cool in college.

Here is Krikorian confirming his foolishness.

So to believe that McCain is a bigger threat to America than Obama is, Kausfiles has to take the position that McCain will do what he says he won’t (sign an amnesty bill), and Obama won’t do what he says he will (withdraw from Iraq, start a disastrous ground war in Afghanistan and attack our allies).

That’s it precisely — McCain will do what he says he won’t and Obama won’t do what he says he will.

So then Obama will NOT withdraw the troops from Iraq. Okey dokey…and he won’t associate with Bill Ayers, Crazy Pastors, doesn’t believe in reparations, has no knowledge of Saul Alinsky, thinks Socialism misguided, he won’t flip off candidates, call women running against him pigs, ask for a billion dollars in earmarks, and his wife is proud of America and has been all of her life. What other fantasies are we to believe in so that quasi-thinkers can masturbate themselves into believing that Obama is not the most dangerous man who has run for President in modern times.

Here is Stanley Kurtz putting paid to that idiocy.

The same separatist, anti-American theology of liberation that was so boldly and bitterly proclaimed by Obama’s pastor is shared, if more quietly, by Obama’s Gamaliel colleagues. The operative word here is “quietly.” Gamaliel specializes in ideological stealth, and Obama, a master student of Gamaliel strategy, shows disturbing signs of being a sub rosa radical himself. Obama’s legislative tactics, as well as his persistent professions of non-ideological pragmatism, appear to be inspired by his radical mentors’ most sophisticated tactics. Not only has Obama studied, taught, and apparently absorbed stealth techniques from radical groups like Gamaliel and ACORN, but in his position as a board member of Chicago’s supposedly nonpartisan Woods Fund, he quietly funneled money to his radical allies — at the very moment he most needed their support to boost his political career. It’s high time for these shadowy, perhaps improper, ties to receive a dose of sunlight.

Yea whatever Krikorian and kaus…shut the hell up and stick to what y’all are good at railing against McCain’s desire to give amnesty to every last illegal alien who has ever wanted to be in the United States. Maybe you know something about that but it is increasingly obvious that I should suspect some lack given your inability to see through the most transparently evil politician to run for office in ages. I am with you on giving McCain hell about amnesty.

Finally to attack Coulter, who got fired for stating the only sort of Anti-Terror policy that has worked, for not being sufficiently hawkish is absurd.

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.

I am betting that both of them wanted a more thoughtful approach…probably along the lines of sending in the police like Obama has promised? Very ashamed of Hot Air to giving kaus a platform. And for being sucked in by a commenter.

In Tribute to 9-11 I Offer McCain…The Old Warrior Our Only Hope

And for the first time he is ahead on Intrade Intrade Market Odds Obamamessiah 49.0 McCain 50.5

RealClearPolitics – Opinion, News, Analysis, Videos and Polls

Some might disagree with my touting a Politician in tribute to 9-11 but at this point winning the war is the best way to offer tribute to those lost. Obama will not win the war…no matter how much Mickey Kraus and Mark Krikorian think he won’t. McCain will win the war or if he doesn’t we will be both militarily stronger and farther along the path to winning.

South Carolina Democrat Chairwoman…Does She Think South Carolina Voters Are Stupid or Simpletons?

First off I am with Andrew McCarthy. Republicans should not be asking for apologies for this sort of crap. We should be privately hoping that the Obama Campaign continues it’s rapid meltdown. We should follow the instructions of the great Corsican Napoleon Bonaparte: Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake 

I personally admire and respect the difficult choices that women make everyday, and I apologize to anyone who finds my comment offensive. I clumsily was making a point about people in South Carolina who may vote based on a single issue. Whether it’s the environment, the economy, the war or a woman’s right to choose, there are people who will cast their vote based on a single issue. That was the only point I was attempting to make. Fowler Responds – Real Clear Politics – Elections 2008 – TIME (emphasis mine)

But we should also never forget to highlight his mistakes when they might get lost among all the other mistakes. Here the Chairwoman of the Democratic party in South Carolina seems to declare that the people of South Carolina are simpletons that will only use one criteria to make their selections and that’s why they love Sarah Palin. And love that standard politician apology…if you are offended I am sorry. Guess she learned that from another Fowler from South Carolina, Dan Fowler. Who had to issue a non-apology after he giggled about the timing of Hurricane Gustav hitting New Orleans which I covered in this post.

WHAT DEMOCRATS SAY WHEN PEOPLE ARE LISTENING…AND WHAT THEY SAY WHEN PEOPLE AREN’T!

Then he issues his “apology” and I covered that with this post.

Screw you very much asswipe…take your bullshit almost apology and stuff it up your ass if you can find any room next to your head.

I wonder if those two clowns are related? Both Fowlers and both at the top of the South Carolina Democratic Party. Small world? Co-incidence? I don’t feel like searching or wasting my time on those two assclowns.

Besides it is a lot more fun listening to my girl decimate Obamamessiah! Here Palin destroys the ONE. Courtesy of HotAir! Who got tipped to this video by the guy who took it Brian Faughnan!

 

Sarah says that she learned everything she needed to know on the basketball courts as a point guard.

You wouldn’t believe how many hits I have been getting on my post where I tried to stack Google with keywords like short shorts..and such. So in the spirit of laughing in the Democrats faces lets have some more fun. SARAH PALIN IN SHORT SHORTS…

Sarah Palin Nude

Poor Democrats all they had was Hope and Change…we brought an asskicking Point Guard and they are falling apart! Man does she look serious and oops fine. Beautiful, smart, drinks beer, fishes, hunts and is in the process of single handedly destroying the Democratic Party. What is not to love?

And she has the left wing media in meltdown mode too…how else to explain CNN falling for this obvious Photoshop. Courtesy of Stop the ACLU!

Sarah Palin porn

Sweet….oh gosh I almost forgot she even has what’s his name…the VP candidate of the ONE admitting that he sucks as a VP and that Hillary would have been better…bitter ooops.

Hmm Allah Not Sure But These Two Blog Posts Sure Seem To Have Predicted Obamamessiah’s Words Perfectly….Lipstick on a Pig and on the Same Blog is Tom Toles Cartoon that the One Plagiarizes Perfectly.

Maybe that’s Why THE ONE Picked Biden…? The Both Love Stealing Work of Others!?!?!

So Allahpundit is having a hard time gloating over the Obamamessiah’s HUGE Gaffe, not me. But it is even funnier when you consider that Obama STOLE the lines from a Blog on the Democrats Public Website. He not only stole the lines about Lipstick on a Pig but he also stole the lines he uttered right before he stuck the entire Democratic Tickets foot into their collective mouths.  Witness this Tom Toles Cartoon in a Blog Post dated September 8.

Isn’t that clever of the ONE? Not satisfied with stealing this material he then goes back to this post and steals THIS.

Palin is Lipstick on a Pig

Hot Air » Blog Archive » The sadly obligatory “pig with lipstick photo at DNC community blog” post

The question becomes who is Elizabeth Berry and does the ONE read her blog? Sure seems like someone might be.