Tag Archives: obamamessiah

Gosh this line from the Blagojevich affidavit seems to be a mite more important than the Drive-bys are letting on to…

Can you imagine the coverage this particular line would be getting, if heaven forbid, a Republican would have won this past November and not LightWorker? The press is so darn corrupt they should be embarrassed to venture outside…yea sure ABC News blog has coverage but I bet money that we won’t see any focus on this particular statement on any Network News. This is a very damning statement. Especially considering Obama DID in fact get his wife onto a Board using political pull.

The FBI affidavit said Blagojevich had been told by an adviser "the president-elect can get Rod Blagojevich’s wife on paid corporate boards in exchange for naming the president-elect’s pick to the Senate."  ABC News: FBI: Illinois Governor Sought To "Sell" Obama’s Senate Seat

I have told my Homeschooled children that I will not teach civics using our government as an example of anything but corruption, since our Government bears no resemblance to that Government that was around when the books were written.

It is a shame and a terrible crime that the first black President is giving so much shame to the office and the bastard isn’t even in office. No one should judge all black politicians by the actions of one but when you are the first black US President you have a responsibility to not be what Obama apparently is…a corrupt bastard.

Come on Sarah…2012

A Very Interesting Look at the Election…The Left’s Big Blunder

This is very interesting and while it is a long article it is very much worth your time.

The Left’s Big Blunder

The disastrously counter-productive strategy of Obama’s supporters

October 15, 2008

Two campaigns are being waged right now for the presidency of the United States. No, I’m not talking about the Obama campaign and the McCain campaign. I’m talking about the real-world campaign and the meta-campaign.
The real-world campaign involves speeches and proposals and facts and scandals and political positions and news events. These details, however, are becoming increasingly irrelevant, and have become subsumed by the meta-campaign, which consists of perceptions, polls, reactions, analyses and summations. Until very recently, elections were decided by real-world facts — but not anymore. Facts and events in and of themselves are no longer important; what’s important is how everyone reacts to them. And how do we find out the public’s mood concerning this or that incident? Why, the media tells us, that’s how.
Or so we’ve been led to believe.

We’re all part of the campaign now. Every single one of us. Our opinions, our actions, are bundled together as a group and used as weapons in the race for the White House. When the media reports on what people think, either through public-opinion polling or reportage about anecdotal incidents, it becomes an endless feedback loop, in which the media’s representation of most people’s purported thoughts is supposed to influence everyone else’s thoughts. And then they take another poll to determine how effective the first poll was in influencing public opinion, and the cycle starts all over again. Since everyone now knows that any public expression of their political opinions might be reported by the media, even the most innocent activity becomes a calculated campaign action. Saying how you intend to vote is not simply an expression of how you intend to vote, but rather a component of the public barometer of how the majority intends to vote, which is then used by the media and the blogs to influence everyone else. Nothing is done in all innocence anymore.
It’s no longer a matter of dispute that the mainstream media, overall, very strongly leans to the left. Over 90% of journalists classify themselves politically as "liberal" to varying degrees, and innumerable instances of left-wing bias on the part of the media have been pointed out by bloggers over the years. Yes, a small subset of media outlets are identifiably conservative, but they are vastly outnumbered, both in sheer numbers and in influence, by the liberal media. This fact takes on intense importance in an era when the "news" becomes (as it has become) a subjective matter. Nearly any fact or incident can be "spun" to Obama’s benefit.
Obama’s supporters and his official campaign have taken great advantage of this felicitous informational landscape — first, that the meta-campaign trumps reality, and second, that the media is cooperative and complicit. For example, after presidential debates, the leading left-wing blogs always coordinate massive online opinion-poll-stuffing campaigns. After the Palin-Biden vice-presidential debate, the overwhelming consensus on conservative and centrist blogs was that Palin had won handily, and that Biden spoke mostly in a soporific monotone while spewing a continuous stream of easily debunked falsehoods. And yet readers of DailyKos, the Huffington Post, Democratic Underground and dozens of other top left-wing blogs swarmed en masse to vote (often repeatedly) in mainstream online polls about the debate, so that afterward, CNN (among many others) could run headlines that said "57% Think Biden Won Debate," basing their conclusion on the results of the online polls. And once enough of these articles get published, then they themselves become "proof" of the debate’s supposed outcome, and before long (often just a matter of hours) it becomes a "fact" no longer up for discussion that Biden won the debate. This fact is then referenced by pundits, and slips into supposedly neutral news stories.
The illusory quest for conformist decision-making in the 2008 presidential election
Say, for example, that you were an Obama supporter who watched the Vice Presidential debate and felt that Palin had done well and was a more effective debater than Biden — though not well enough to change your mind about voting for the Obama-Biden ticket. Immediately afterward you encounter an online poll, asking you to vote on who won the debate. What do you do? I suspect that most, if not nearly all, Obama supporters would lie and still vote in the poll that Biden had won the debate, even though they felt that Palin had in fact defeated him. But why do so? As an Obama supporter, you still want your candidate to win, so that every action you take should revolve around only one question: Will this help Obama win? Probably unconsciously, people assume without really thinking about why, that if enough people say Biden won the debate, then a general consensus will be reached that Biden did win the debate, and as a result some vague category of Americans who up until that point had not been Obama supporters will change their allegiances and in reality vote for Obama-Biden on election day.
The Obama campaign itself also takes advantage of the sympathetic media to construct a facade of inevitability. The campaign will stage-manage crowds and dictate camera angles so that Obama is seen to not only have overwhelming numbers of fans but the correct demographic proportion of fans; the campaign will coordinate Obama appearances to coincide with rock concerts or other festivals so they can point to the huge crowds who showed up to watch Obama; and the media plays right along.

McCain supporters often complain about this strategy by the Left, going to great pains to point out the poll stuffing, the deceptive photos, the crowd overestimation, the slanted media coverage, and so forth. But should conservatives be so concerned? I propose that McCain supporters should be GLAD this is happening — because the Left is in fact making a disastrous strategic blunder.
A substantial portion of the Left’s strategy during this campaign is to create the perception that as many people as possible are supporting Obama. They strive to not simply show that he has a lot of supporters (which, obviously, he has), but to purposely inflate or exaggerate the numbers in order to make his support seem larger than it really is. The drive to do this seems almost automatic; it is assumed by Obama’s supporters to be the most effective campaign strategy. It’s so automatic that they perhaps are no longer even aware that it is a strategy. But why? What purpose is possibly served by this behavior? Has anyone on the Left ever paused, stepped back, and asked, "Wait a minute — why are we doing this? Are we sure it’s the correct course of action?" Doing everything possible to inflate the perceived support of Democratic candidates has become so de rigueur that the Left has long ago forgotten why they’re even doing it.
This essay examines the underlying faulty assumptions of this strategy — and shows why it’s not only counter-productive, but could backfire disastrously. The Left’s Big Blunder


All of this makes a lot of sense. He needs to get out in front of cameras and repeat this over and over again! Because almost as important as calming the financial markets is keeping that closet Marxist, Obama, out of the White House.

We are in the greatest financial crisis of our lifetimes.  Congressional inaction has put every American and the entire economy at the gravest risk.   Yesterday the country and the world looked to Washington for leadership, and Congress once again came up empty-handed. 

I am disappointed at the lack of resolve and bipartisan good will among members of both parties to fix this problem.  Bipartisanship is a tough thing; never more so when you’re trying to take necessary but publicly unpopular action.  But inaction is not an option. 

Businesses all over the country cannot borrow to finance their own operations and pay their bills.  If we do nothing, many may fail.

Sonic Corporation, a drive-in restaurant chain based in Oklahoma, learned on Thursday that one of its lenders, GE Capital, had stopped extending new loans to the chain’s franchisees. That will block plans to rebuild restaurants, add equipment and open new locations.  When small businesses like Sonic franchisees can’t borrow, contractors don’t get the remodeling work, equipment-makers lose sales, and restaurants go out of business.  It hurts the entire community.

When financing dries up, students can’t get loans.

In Wisconsin, more than 100 Milwaukee Area Technical College students couldn’t access private loans to fund their education.   Fortunately the school was able to come up with emergency loans, but this temporary arrangement cannot continue.   Markets need to work so that people can get financial help and students can be educated.

Again, inaction is not an option.

In light of the House’s failure to act, this morning, I spoke to the President about two things that the administration has not done, but should do following the inaction of Congress:

First, the Treasury has already used its Exchange Stabilization Fund to back money market accounts.  I encourage it to use it this fund as creatively as possible to provide backstop for accounts across our financial system to maintain confidence on the part of savers and investors. 

And second, the recent housing bill gave the government nearly $1 trillion in authority to purchase mortgages.  Housing and mortgages are at the root of this crisis.  I encourage Treasury to take action to shore up mortgage values.

The Administration can take these actions with the stroke of the pen to help alleviate the crisis gripping our economy.  I urge them to do so.

Also, the FDIC should quickly be granted the authority to increase the deposit insurance cap from $100,000 to $250,000 so that families do not have to worry about their money.  We cannot allow a crisis in our financial system to become a crisis in confidence.

I call on everyone in Washington to come together in a bipartisan way to address this crisis.  I know that many of the solutions to this problem may be unpopular, but the dire consequences of inaction will be far more damaging to the economic security of American families and the fault will be all ours.

I will continue to do whatever I can to aid in a constructive answer to the challenge before us. The Corner on National Review Online

Hot Air Channeling Bullshit From Mickey Kaus, the Same Guy Who Believes a Closet Marxist (Obama) Is Better for America Than a American Hero McCain…Okey Dokey.

Listen up folks no one who reads my blog can accuse me of being for Amnesty. But there are things that are more important than Illegal Immigration…like maybe the fact that a bunch of Islamic Lunatics want to set off a Nuke inside of Mickey Kaus’s pants. Hot Air Headlines » Ann Coulter thinks it’s “insane” to send more troops to Afghanistan? So when both Mickey Kaus who seems to be voting for Obama and Mark Krikorian start putting words into Ann Coulters mouth to attack McCain we know we have reached absurdity times 2.

The problem is to start neither of them and for that matter Hot Air are clever enough to understand that it is NOT Ann Coulter they are quoting it is the Blogger who runs the GetDrunkAndVote4McCain Blog. That aside both Mark Krikorian and Kaus are seriously delusional if they believe that Obama will prosecute the war on terror with the same fervor as McCain. Obama is a closet Marxist and no sorry that is not a good thing even if it was cool in college.

Here is Krikorian confirming his foolishness.

So to believe that McCain is a bigger threat to America than Obama is, Kausfiles has to take the position that McCain will do what he says he won’t (sign an amnesty bill), and Obama won’t do what he says he will (withdraw from Iraq, start a disastrous ground war in Afghanistan and attack our allies).

That’s it precisely — McCain will do what he says he won’t and Obama won’t do what he says he will.

So then Obama will NOT withdraw the troops from Iraq. Okey dokey…and he won’t associate with Bill Ayers, Crazy Pastors, doesn’t believe in reparations, has no knowledge of Saul Alinsky, thinks Socialism misguided, he won’t flip off candidates, call women running against him pigs, ask for a billion dollars in earmarks, and his wife is proud of America and has been all of her life. What other fantasies are we to believe in so that quasi-thinkers can masturbate themselves into believing that Obama is not the most dangerous man who has run for President in modern times.

Here is Stanley Kurtz putting paid to that idiocy.

The same separatist, anti-American theology of liberation that was so boldly and bitterly proclaimed by Obama’s pastor is shared, if more quietly, by Obama’s Gamaliel colleagues. The operative word here is “quietly.” Gamaliel specializes in ideological stealth, and Obama, a master student of Gamaliel strategy, shows disturbing signs of being a sub rosa radical himself. Obama’s legislative tactics, as well as his persistent professions of non-ideological pragmatism, appear to be inspired by his radical mentors’ most sophisticated tactics. Not only has Obama studied, taught, and apparently absorbed stealth techniques from radical groups like Gamaliel and ACORN, but in his position as a board member of Chicago’s supposedly nonpartisan Woods Fund, he quietly funneled money to his radical allies — at the very moment he most needed their support to boost his political career. It’s high time for these shadowy, perhaps improper, ties to receive a dose of sunlight.

Yea whatever Krikorian and kaus…shut the hell up and stick to what y’all are good at railing against McCain’s desire to give amnesty to every last illegal alien who has ever wanted to be in the United States. Maybe you know something about that but it is increasingly obvious that I should suspect some lack given your inability to see through the most transparently evil politician to run for office in ages. I am with you on giving McCain hell about amnesty.

Finally to attack Coulter, who got fired for stating the only sort of Anti-Terror policy that has worked, for not being sufficiently hawkish is absurd.

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.

I am betting that both of them wanted a more thoughtful approach…probably along the lines of sending in the police like Obama has promised? Very ashamed of Hot Air to giving kaus a platform. And for being sucked in by a commenter.

South Carolina Democrat Chairwoman…Does She Think South Carolina Voters Are Stupid or Simpletons?

First off I am with Andrew McCarthy. Republicans should not be asking for apologies for this sort of crap. We should be privately hoping that the Obama Campaign continues it’s rapid meltdown. We should follow the instructions of the great Corsican Napoleon Bonaparte: Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake 

I personally admire and respect the difficult choices that women make everyday, and I apologize to anyone who finds my comment offensive. I clumsily was making a point about people in South Carolina who may vote based on a single issue. Whether it’s the environment, the economy, the war or a woman’s right to choose, there are people who will cast their vote based on a single issue. That was the only point I was attempting to make. Fowler Responds – Real Clear Politics – Elections 2008 – TIME (emphasis mine)

But we should also never forget to highlight his mistakes when they might get lost among all the other mistakes. Here the Chairwoman of the Democratic party in South Carolina seems to declare that the people of South Carolina are simpletons that will only use one criteria to make their selections and that’s why they love Sarah Palin. And love that standard politician apology…if you are offended I am sorry. Guess she learned that from another Fowler from South Carolina, Dan Fowler. Who had to issue a non-apology after he giggled about the timing of Hurricane Gustav hitting New Orleans which I covered in this post.


Then he issues his “apology” and I covered that with this post.

Screw you very much asswipe…take your bullshit almost apology and stuff it up your ass if you can find any room next to your head.

I wonder if those two clowns are related? Both Fowlers and both at the top of the South Carolina Democratic Party. Small world? Co-incidence? I don’t feel like searching or wasting my time on those two assclowns.

Besides it is a lot more fun listening to my girl decimate Obamamessiah! Here Palin destroys the ONE. Courtesy of HotAir! Who got tipped to this video by the guy who took it Brian Faughnan!


Sarah says that she learned everything she needed to know on the basketball courts as a point guard.

You wouldn’t believe how many hits I have been getting on my post where I tried to stack Google with keywords like short shorts..and such. So in the spirit of laughing in the Democrats faces lets have some more fun. SARAH PALIN IN SHORT SHORTS…

Sarah Palin Nude

Poor Democrats all they had was Hope and Change…we brought an asskicking Point Guard and they are falling apart! Man does she look serious and oops fine. Beautiful, smart, drinks beer, fishes, hunts and is in the process of single handedly destroying the Democratic Party. What is not to love?

And she has the left wing media in meltdown mode too…how else to explain CNN falling for this obvious Photoshop. Courtesy of Stop the ACLU!

Sarah Palin porn

Sweet….oh gosh I almost forgot she even has what’s his name…the VP candidate of the ONE admitting that he sucks as a VP and that Hillary would have been better…bitter ooops.

Abortion…Wasn’t the Argument About Where Life Begins? Hmmm if you are leaving babies to die…hasn’t life begun? What sort of Doctors allow babies to die…nay what sort of human! What sort of politician supports that?

Naturally Obamamessiah supports that…apparently allowing babies to die is NOT above his pay grade.

Obama heard the testimony of a nurse, Jill Stanek. She recounted how she’d spent 45 minutes holding a living baby left to die.

The child had lacked the good grace to expire as planned in an induced-labor abortion — one in which an abortionist artificially induces labor with the expectation that the underdeveloped “fetus, or child — however you want to describe it” will not survive the delivery.

Stanek encountered another nurse carrying the child to a “soiled utility room” where it would be left to die. It wasn’t that unusual. The induced-labor method was used for late-term abortions. Many of the babies were strong enough to survive the delivery. At least for a time.

Hot Air » Blog Archive » McCarthy: Obama’s moral failing on infanticide

Declaring what his position on when babies get human rights is above his pay grade.

Asked at what point a baby gets “human rights,” Obama, who strongly supports abortion rights, said: “… whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question  with specificity … is above my pay grade.”

Okey dokey…so deciding to allow a baby born alive during an abortion to die is not above the pay grade of an Illinois legislator, but IS above the pay grade of a person desiring to be the President of the United States. Please Democrats nominate this evil person.

Andrew McCarthy takes him apart in this typically hard hitting article.

There wasn’t any question about what was happening. The abortions were going wrong. The babies weren’t cooperating. They wouldn’t die as planned. Or, as Illinois state senator Barack Obama so touchingly put it, there was “movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead.”

No, Senator. They wouldn’t go along with the program. They wouldn’t just come out limp and dead.

Obamamessiah in hearings on a bill to force the medical establishment to give medical care to born alive aborted babies seems to be well within his "Pay Grade" when he makes this astonishing statement!

SENATOR OBAMA: So — and again, I’m — I’m not going to prolong this, but I just want to be clear because I think this was the source of the objections of the Medical Society. As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child — however way you want to describe it — is now outside the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that it’s nonviable but there’s, let’s say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead, that, in fact, they would then have to call a second physician to monitor and check off and make sure that this is not a live child that could be saved. Is that correct?

Apparently Obamessiah wanted to continue the practice of leaving the babies in the soiled linen closet! Obamamessiah voted against allowing care to be given to these children…yes children. Obamamessiah may try to declare them viable fetuses in an attempt to dehumanize them but we don’t roll that way.

Ironically his declared reason for opposing this legislation was he was afraid that it might be used to overturn ROE vs WADE. Seems to me that bringing the inhumanity of this to light by fighting it did far more damage to ROE vs WADE. Indeed I bet that is why every single other US Senator voted for it including Barbara Boxer and Hillary Clinton when this went to the US Senate. So he is dangerous to his friends as well as his enemies. That is usually the definition of an idiot.

The Church Of Obama « The Edwards Report

The Edwards Report has a terrific post on The Church of Obama…or Obamamessiah as he loves to be called.  And it’s so good that the terrific comment that I have copied here as a teaser came in second on the laughometer. Notherwords bring your sorry sinning ass over there right now and be SAVED DAMMIT!

The Book of The Obamassiah

The Obamassiah shall reveal himself to us by his teachings, which will be the spoken word in the form of the finest silk and silver.

Do not fear if the words of the Obamassiah are not at first clear, you need only to hear them and believe. Be not afraid if the feeling of a cool breeze runs up one’s leg. Do not fear if the words of his glory remove you from your senses and fainting occurs.

Our savior shall become known to us by the wreath of arugala upon his head and his ears for they shall take the form of the handles of a jug of the finest wine.

I. Thou shalt not speak the middle name of the Obamassiah. To do so exposes thine as a racist and it shall not be tolerated.

II. Thou shalt not mention past associations of the Obamassiah. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For despite any recent or current friendship his holiness may have with them, he was only a child when they ran afoul of the law. Or he missed that sermon.

III. Thou shalt not mention praise of the Obamassiah by murderers and tyrants. To do so exposes thine as a racist, it is a sign that thine has truly lost one’s bearings.

IV. Thou shalt not mention the schooling of the Obamassiah at any point in his existence. To do so exposes thine as a racist.

V. Thou shalt not question the Obamassiah more than eight times. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For the time of his holiness is of a value beyond your own.

VI. Thou shalt not question the past of the Obamassiah family arrival or his birth. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For events in time matter not if they occur differently than his holiness speaks of them. It matters only that you believe.

VII. Thou shalt not question the words of the Obamassiah’s spouse. For if her words mirror those of the past associations of his holiness then thine is a racist twice over for the mention of them. (see II)

VIII. The purveyors of words to the people shall cast only praise on the Obamassiah. To turn from this exposes thine as a racist and a soldier of the unbeliever and thine should be cast out and lose any source of livelihood.

IX. Thou shalt not question the patriotism of the Obamassiah. To do so exposes thine as a racist. For by not displaying any outward love for his land only proves his love for his land.

Those unenlightened to the truth, and the light, and the way of the Obamassiah shall cling to armaments and religions other than that of the Obamassiah and will mistrust his glory for they understand it not.

This is the word of the Obamassiah. The Church Of Obama « The Edwards Report

Brittiny and Paris would approve…heh. Paris Hilton and Britney Spears discussing Obamamessiah

Obamamessiah rocking and rolling straight into the sermon on the mount! Hilarious Satire from England! He ventured forth to bring light to the world

Brilliant bit of satire that captures perfectly the idiocy the campaign of Obamamessiah. Naturally an Englishman wrote it.

And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.

The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.

When he was twelve years old, they found him in the temple in the City of Chicago, arguing the finer points of community organisation with the Prophet Jeremiah and the Elders. And the Elders were astonished at what they heard and said among themselves: “Verily, who is this Child that he opens our hearts and minds to the audacity of hope?”

In the great Battles of Caucus and Primary he smote the conniving Hillary, wife of the deposed King Bill the Priapic and their barbarian hordes of Working Class Whites.

And so it was, in the fullness of time, before the harvest month of the appointed year, the Child ventured forth – for the first time – to bring the light unto all the world.

He travelled fleet of foot and light of camel, with a small retinue that consisted only of his loyal disciples from the tribe of the Media. He ventured first to the land of the Hindu Kush, where the

Taleban had harboured the viper of al-Qaeda in their bosom, raining terror on all the world.

And the Child spake and the tribes of Nato immediately loosed the Caveats that had previously bound them. And in the great battle that ensued the forces of the light were triumphant. For as long as the

Child stood with his arms raised aloft, the enemy suffered great blows and the threat of terror was no more.

He ventured forth to bring light to the world | Gerard Baker – Times Online

John McCain 2008 – John McCain for President

This hurts me more than you can know…but the Angry Black Marxist Obama scares me. If Obama gets into office the he will make the Clinton’s look like Republicans. McCain is a bastard no doubt…no I won’t forgive him for his collaboration with Kennedy on Amnesty. But he is much less of a bastard than Obama.

Well anyway. I just gave to the Campaign and I hope you do to since McCain will need every penny he can get to blast through the media hype for Obama. Make no mistake every single media outlet will be working for the Obamamessiah Election committee.

John McCain 2008 – John McCain for President